Bibliography

Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. (2003) Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 185-210.

Arnau, R. C., Thompson, R. L. and Cook, C. (2001) Do different response formats change the latent structure of responses? An empirical example using taxometric analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 23-44.

Ballard, C. and Prine, R. (2002) Citizen perceptions of community policing: Comparing Internet and mail survey responses. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 4.

Bandilla, W. (2002) Web surveys - An appropriate mode of data collection for the social sciences? in Batinic, B., Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Online Social Sciences. Seattle, WA. Hogrefe and Huber. pp. 1-6.

Bandilla, W. and Bosnjak, M. (2000) Online-Surveys als Herausforderung für die Umfrageforschung, in Mohler, P. P. and Lüttinger, P. (Eds.) Festschrift für Max Kaase. Mannheim, ZUMA. pp. 9-28.

Barnes, S. B. (2003) Issues of attribution and identification in online social research, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) Online Social Research New York. Peter Lang. pp. 203-222.

Bennett, G. (2000) Using incentives to ensure quality data and high response rates. Paper presented at Online market research and web based surveys conference, London, May 30 - June 1. Abstract.

Bernard, M. and Mills, M. (2000) So, what size and type of font should I use on my web-site? Usability News 2, 2.

Bernard, M., Lida, B., Riley, S., Hackler, T. and Jamzen, K. (2002) A comparison of popular online fonts: Which type and size is best? Usability News 4, 1.

Best, S. J. and Kruger, B. (2002) New approached to assessing opinion: The prospects for electronic mail surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 73-92.

Best, S. J. and Krueger, B. S. (2004) Internet data collection. Sage University Paper 141. London. Sage.

Best, S. J., Krueger, B., Hubbard, C. and Smith, A. (2001) An assessment of the generalizability of Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 131-145.

Birnbaum, M. H. (2004) Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-832.

Birnholtz, J. P., Horn, D. B., Finholt, T. A. and Bae, S. J. (2004) The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents, Social Science Computer Review, 22, 3, 355-362.

Bosnjak, M. and Batinic, B. (2002) Understanding the willingness to participate in online surveys - The case of e-mail questionnaires, in Batinic, B., Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Online Social Sciences Seattle, WA. Hogrefe and Huber. pp. 81-92.

Bosnjak, M. and Tuten, T. L. (2001) Classifying response behaviors in web-based surveys, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6, 3.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/boznjak.html.

Bosnjak, M. and Tuten, T. L. (2003) Prepaid and promised incentives in Web surveys: An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 208-217.

Bosnjak, M., Tuten T. L. and Bandilla, W. (1991) Participation in web surveys: A typology, ZUMA Nachrichten, 48, 7-17.

Brenner, V. (2002) Generalizability issues in Internet-based survey research: Implications for the Internet addiction controversy, in Batinic, B., Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Online Social Sciences. Seattle, WA. Hogrefe and Huber. pp. 93-113.

Carini, R.M. et al (2003) College students responses to web and paper based surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44, 1, 1-19.

Chen, S. S. and Christians, C. G. (2003) Introduction: Technological environments and the evolution of social research methods, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) Online Social Research New Work. Peter Lang. pp. 15-24.

Couper, M. (2000) Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 4, 384-396.

Couper, M. P. and Miller, P. V. (2008) Web survey methods - Introduction, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 5, 831–835.

Couper, M., Traugott, M. W. and Lamias, M. J. (2001) Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 2, 230-253.

Conrad, F., Couper, M., Tourangeau, R. and Peytchev, A. (2005) Impact of progress feedback on task completion: First impression matters. Paper presented at the conference CHI 2005, April 2-7, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Cook, C., Heath, F. and Thompson, R. L. (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web or internet-based surveys, Educational and Psychological measurement, 60, 6, 821-836.

Coomber, R. (1997) Using the Internet for survey research, Sociological Research Online, 2, 2.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html.

Crawford, S. D ., Couper, M. P. and Lamias, M. J. (2001) Web-surveys: Perceptions of burdens, Social Science Computer Review, 19, 2, 146-162.

Denscombe, M. (2003) The good research guide for small scale research projects. Maidenhead. Open University Press.

Dillman, D. A. (2000) Mail and internet surveys - the tailored design method. New York. Wiley.

Dillman, D. A. and Bowker, D. K. (2001) The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists, in Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Dimensions of Internet science. Lengerich, Germany. Pabst Science Publishers. pp. 159-178.

Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R. D. and Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for Constructing Web Surveys. SESRC Technical Report 98-50. Pullman. Washington.

Dodd, J. (1998) Market research on the Internet- threat or opportunity? Marketing and Research Today, 26, 1, 60-66.

Ekman, A., Klint, A., Dickman, P. W., Adami, H. and Litton, J. (2007) Optimizing the design of web-based questionnaires – experience from a population-based study among 50,000 women, European Journal of Epidemiology, 22, 293–300.

Frick, A., Bachtiger, M. T. and Reips, U. D. (2001) Financial incentives, personal information and drop-out rate in online studies in Reaps, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Dimensions of internet science. Lengerich. Pabst Science Publishers. pp. 209-220.

Glover, D. and Bush, T. (2005) The online or e-survey: a research approach for the ICT age. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28, 2, 135-146.

Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S. and John, O. P. (2004) Should we trust Web-based studies? American Psychologist, 59, 93-104.

Gräf, L. (2002) Assessing internet questionnaires: The online pretest lab, in Batinic, B., Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Online Social Sciences. Seattle. Hogrefe & Huber. pp. 49-68.

Harris, C. (1997) Developing online market research methods and tools, Paper presented to ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Seminar. Lisbon, July 1997.

Heerwegh, D. (2004) Using progress indicators in web surveys. Paper prepared for the 59th AAPOR conference, Phoenix, Arizona, May 13-16, 2004.

Heerwegh, D. and Loosveldt, G. (2008) Face-to-face versus web surveying in a high-internet-coverage: Population differences in response quality, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 5, 836–846.

Heerwegh, D. and Loosveldt, G. (2006) Personalizing e-mail contacts: its influence on web survey response rate and social desirability response bias, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 2, 258-268.

Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D. and Vogel, C. (2003) Internet Research Methods. London. Sage.

Huber, P. J. (1967) The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, pp. 221-233.

Janelle, D. G. and Hodge, D. C. (2000) Information, place, cyberspace and accessibility, in Janelle, D. G. and Hodge, D. C. (Eds.) Information, Place and Cyberspace. New York. Springer. pp. 3-12.

Jeavons, A. (1998) Ethology and the web: Observing respondent behaviour in web surveys. Proceedings of the Worldwide Internet Conference, Amsterdam, ESOMAR.

Joinson, A. N. Paine, C. Buchanan, T and Reips, U-D. (2008) Measuring self-disclosure online: Blurring and non-response to sensitive items in web-based surveys, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2158–2171.

Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A. and Reips, U-D. (2007) Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered internet surveys, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 275–285.

Kaczimirek, L. (2008) Internet survey software tools. In Fielding, N., Lee, R. M. and Blank, G. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of Online Research Methods. London. SAGE. pp. 236-254.

Kaye, B. K. and Johnson, T. J. (1999) Taming the cyber frontier: Techniques for improving online surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 323-337.

Knapp, F. and Heidingsfelder, M. (2001) Drop-out analysis: The effect of research design, in Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Dimensions of internet science. Lengerich. Pabst Science Publishers. pp. 221-230.

Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J. and Couper, M. (2004) Psychological research online. American Psychologist, 59, 105-117.

Lefever, S., Dal, M. and Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2007) Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations, British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 4, 574–582.

Litvin, S. W. and Kar, G. H. (2001) E-surveying for tourism research: Legitimate tool or a researcher's fantasy? Journal of Travel Research, 39, 308-314.

Luce, K.H., Winzelberg, A.J., Das, S., Osborne, M.I., Bryson, S.W., and Taylor, C.B. (2007) Reliability of self-report: paper versus online administration, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 3, 1384-1389.

Lumsden, J. and Morgan, W. (2005) Online-Questionnaire Design: Establishing Guidelines and Evaluating Existing Support. National Research Council Canada.  Available online at:
https://iit-iti.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/iit-publications-iti/docs/NRC-47436.pdf

Madge, C. and O'Connor, H. (2002) Online with e-mums: Exploring the Internet as a medium for research, Area, 34, 1, 92-102.

Madge, C. and O'Connor, H. (in press) Mothers in the making? Exploring notations of liminality in hybrid cyber/space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

Mann, C. and Stewart, F. (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. London. Sage.

McDonald, H. and Adam, S. (2003) A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 21, 2, 85-95.

Michael Bowling, J., Rimer, B.K., Lyons, E.J., Golin, C.E., Frydman,
G., and Ribisl, K.M. (2006) Methodologic challenges of e-health research, Evaluation and Program Planning 29, 4, 390-396.

Miller, T. W. and Panjikaran, K. J. (2001) Studies in Comparability: The Propensity Scoring Approach. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Neustadtl, A., Robinson, J. P. and Kestnbaum, M. (2002) Doing social science research online, in Wellman, B. and Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.) The Internet in Everyday Life Malden, MA. Blackwell. pp. 186-211.

O'Connor, H. and Madge, C. (2004) My mum's thirty years out of date: The role of the Internet in the transition to motherhood, Community, Work and Family. 7, 3, 351-369.

O'Lear, R. M. (1996) Using electronic mail (e-mail) surveys for geographic research: Lessons from a survey of Russian environmentalists, Professional Geographer, 48, 209-217.

O’ Neil, K. M. and Penrod, S. D. (2001) Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 33, 226-233.

O’Neil, K. M., Penrod, S. D. and Bornstein, B. H. (2003) Web-based research: Methodological variables’ effects on dropout and sample characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 217-226.

O'Schaefer, D. R. and Dillman, D. A. (1998) Development of standard email methodology, Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 3, 378-397.

Painea, C., Reips, U-D., Stieger, S., Joinson, A. and Buchanan, T. (2007) Internet users’ perceptions of ‘privacy concerns’ and ‘privacy actions’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 526–536.

Pealer L. N., Weiler, R. M., Pigg, R. M., Miller, D. and Dorman, S. M. (2001) The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behaviour form data from college students, Health, Education and Behaviour, 28, 5, 547-599.

Pearrow, M. (2000) Web Site Usability Handbook. Rockland, Mass. Charles River Media, Inc.

Phippen, A. (2007) How Virtual Are Virtual Methods? Methodological Innovations Online, 2, 1.

Porter, S. R. and Whitcomb, M. E. (2003a) The impact of lottery incentives on survey response rates. Research in Higher Education, 44, 4, 389-407.

Porter, S. R. and Whitcomb, M. E. (2003b) The impact of contact type on web-survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 4, 579-589.

Ranchhod, A. and Zhou, F. (2001) Comparing respondents of e-mail and mail surveys: Understanding the implications of technology. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 19, 254-262.

Rigden, C. (1999) The eye of the beholder- designing for colour blind users British telecommunications Engineering Journal 17, 2-5.

Riva, G., Teruzzi, T. and Anolli, L. (2003) The use of the Internet in psychological research: Comparison of online and offline questionnaires, CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 1, 73-80.

Roberts, L. D. and Parks, M. R. (2001) The social geography of gender switching in virtual environments on the Internet, in Green, E. and Adam, A. (Eds.) Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Gender. London. Routledge. pp. 265-285.

Sax, L. J., Gilmartin S. K. and Bryant A. N. (2003) Assessing response rates and non response bias in web and paper surveys, Research in Higher Education, 44, 4, 409-431.

Schaefer, D. R. and Dillman, D. A. (1998) Development of a Standard E-mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 378-397.

Schonlau, M., Asch, B. J. and Du, C. (2003) Web surveys as part of a mixed-mode strategy for populations that cannot be contacted by e-mail. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 218-222.

Scriven, A. and Smith-Ferrier, S. (2003) The application of online surveys for workplace health research, Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 123, 2, 95-101.

Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P. and Fishwick, L. (2007) Going online for health advice: Changes in usage and trust practices over the last five years, Interacting with Computers, 19, 3, 397-406.

Silver, D. (2000) Looking backwards, looking forwards: Cybercultural studies 1990-2000, in Gauntlett, D. (Ed.) Web.Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London. Arnold. pp. 19-30.

Smith, C. (1997) Casting the net: Surveying an Internet population, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 1.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/smith.html.

Sweet, C. (2001) Designing and conducting virtual focus groups, Qualitative Market Research: an International Journal, 4, 3, 130-135.

Taylor, H., Bremer, J., Overmeyer, C., Siegel, J. W. and Terhanian, S. (2001) Touchdown! Online polling scores big in November 2000, Public perspective, 12, 33-35.

Taylor, T. L. (1999) Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities and other online research challenges, American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 436-449.

Toepoel, V., Das, M. and van Soest, A. (2008) Effects of design in web surveys: Comparing trained and fresh respondents, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 5, 985–1007.

Truell, A. D., Bartlett, J. E., II. and Alexander, M. W. (2002) Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 46-49.

Umbach, P. D. (2004) Web surveys: Best practices, New Directions in Institutional Research, 121, 23-38.

Valentine, G. (2001) Social geographies. Space and society. Harlow. Prentice Hall.

Wakeford, N. (2000) New media, new methodologies: Studying the web, in Gauntlett, D. (Ed.) Web.Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London. Arnold. pp. 31-41.

Warf, B. (2001) Segueways into cyberspace: Multiple geographies of the digital divide, Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 28, 3-19.

Welker, M. (2001) E-mail surveys: Non-response figures reflected, in Reips, U. D. and Bosnjak, M. (Eds.) Dimensions of Internet science. Lengerich, Germany. Pabst Science Publishers. pp. 231-238.

Witmer, D. F. Colman, R. and Katzman, S. L. (1999) From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard: Towards a methodology for survey research on the Internet, in Jones, S. (Ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. London. Sage. pp. 145-161.

Wonshik, C. (2003) Issues in Internet research. Nursing Outlook, 51, 6-12.

Zhang, Q., Shao, P. and Fang, J. (2008) Bibliometric Analysis of Current Web Survey Research in China, Tsinghua science and technology, 13, 3, 420-424.

Zhang, Y. (1999) Using the internet for survey research: A case study, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 51, 1, 57-68.

 

CLOSE

Altinay, L. and Paraskevas, A. (2006) A computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) approach in teaching research methods, International Journal of hospitality management (in press - doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.05.005).

Ayling, R. and Mewse, A. J. (2009) Evaluating Internet Interviews With Gay Men. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1, 566-576.

Bampton, R. and Cowton, C. J. (2002) The E-interview, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3, 2.
http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02/2-02bamptoncowton-e.htm.

Becker, S. and Bryman, A. (Eds.) (2004) Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice. Bristol. Policy Press.

Beusch, D. (2007) Textual Interaction as Sexual Interaction: Sexuality And/in the Online Interview, Sociological Research Online, 12, 5, Available online at:
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/14.html

Burgess, R. (1984) In the Field. An Introduction to Field Research. London. Allen and Unwin.

Chen, P. and Hinton, S. M. (1999) Realtime interviewing using the world wide web. Sociological Research Online, 4, 3.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html.

Comley, P. (1996) The use of the Internet as a data collection method. ESOMAR/EMAC Symposium, Edinburgh, November 1996.

Coomber, R. (1997) Using the Internet for survey research. Sociological Research Online, 2, 2.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html.

Davis, M., Golding, G., Hart, G., Sherr, L. and Elford, J. (2004) Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London, Aids Care, 16, 8, 944 - 952.

Finegold, A. R. D. and Cooke, L. (2006) Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups, Internet and Higher Education, 9, 3, 201-215.

Fischer, M., Lyon, S. and Zeitlyn, D. (2008) The internet and the future of social science research. In Fielding, N., Lee, R. M. and Blank, G. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of Online Research Methods. London. SAGE. pp. 519-536.

Flick, U. (2002) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London. Sage.

Fox, F., Morris, M. and Rumsey, N. (2007) Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 4, 539-547.

Gaiser, T. (1997) Conducting online focus groups: A methodological discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 2, 135-144.

Gaiser, T. J. (2008) Online focus groups. In Fielding, N., Lee, R. M. and Blank, G. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of Online Research Methods. London. SAGE. pp. 290-306.

Glesne, C. and Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. White Plains. Longman.

Guiller, J. and Durndell, A. (2007) Students' linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 5), 2240-2255.

Hamilton, R. J. and Bowers, B. J. (2006) Internet recruitment and email interviews in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 6, 821-835.

Hancock, J. T. (2007) Digital deception. Why, when and how people lie online. In Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. and Reips, U. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 289-301.

Hewson, C. (2007) Gathering data on the Internet: Qualitative approaches and possibilities for mixed methods and research. In Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. and Reips, U. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 405-428.

Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D. and Vogel, C. (2003) Internet Research Methods. London. Sage.

Hughes, J. and Lang, K. (2004) Issues in Online Focus Groups: Lessons learned from an empirical study of peer-to-peer filesharing system users. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2, 2, 95-110.

Illingworth, N. (2001) The Internet matters: Exploring the use of the internet as a research tool. Sociological Research Online, 6, 2.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/illingworth.html.

Im, E. O. and Chee, W. (2006) An online forum as a qualitative research method: Practical issues. Nursing Research, 55, 4., 267-273.

James, N. (2007) The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 6, 963-976.

James, N. and Busher, H. (2006) Credibility, Authenticity and Voice: Dilemmas in Online Interviewing, Qualitative Research, 6, 3, 403-420.

Joinson, N. J. and Paine, C. (2007) Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet, in Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. and Reips, U. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp.237-252.

James, N. and Busher, H. (2006) Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing, Qualitative Research, 6, 3, 403-420.

James, N. and Busher, H. (2007) Ethical issues in online educational research: Protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30, 1, 101-113.

Kitchin, R. (1998) Towards geographies of cyberspace. Progress in Human Geography, 22, 3, 385-406.

Kivits, J. (2004) Researching the informed patient: The case of online health information. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 4, 510-530.

Kivits, J. (2005) Online interviewing and the research relationship, in Hine, C. (Ed.) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford. Berg. pp. 35-49.

Kralik, D., Price, K., Warren, J. and Koch, T. (2006) Issues in data generation using email group conversations for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 2, 213-220.

Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks. Sage.

Kvale, S. and Svend, B.(2008) InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks. Sage.

Livingstone, S. and Bober M. (2004) UK Children Go Online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. London: LSE Research Online.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/395/1/UKCGOsurveyreport.pdf

Mann, C. and Stewart, F. (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. London. Sage.

May, T. (2001) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham. Open University Press.

Meho, L. I. (2006) E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57, 10, 1284-1295.

Morgan, D. L. (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London. Sage.

Murray, C. and Sixsmith, J. (1998) E-mail: A qualitative research medium for interviewing? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1, 2, 103-121.

Nguyen, D. T. and Alexander, J. (1996) The coming of cyberspacetime and the end of polity, in Shields, R. (Ed.) Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies. London. Sage.

O’Connor, H. and Madge, C. (2001) Cyber-mothers: Online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociological Research Online, 5, 4.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/o'connor.html.

O'Connor, H., Madge, C., Shaw, R. and Wellens, J. (2008) Internet-based interviewing, in Fielding, N., Lee, R. M. and Blank, G. (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of Online Research Methods. London. Routledge. pp.271-289.

Orgad, S. (2005) From online to offline and back: Moving from online to offline relationships with research informants, in Hine, C. (Ed.) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford. Berg. pp. 51-65.

Osman, G. and Herring, S. C. (2007) Interaction, facilitation, and deep learning in cross-cultural chat: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 125–141.

Paccagnella, L. (1997) Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 1 267-288.

Paulus, T. (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 4

Poster, M. (1995) Postmodern virtualities, in Fetherstone, M. and Burrows, R. (Eds.) Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. London. Sage.

Rezabek, R. (2002) Online Focus Groups: Electronic Discussions for Research, Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Available nline at:
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1128

Rheingold, H. (1994) The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerised World. London. Secker and Warburg.

Robson, C. (1993) Real World Research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers. Oxford. Blackwell.

Rutter, J. and Smith, G. W. H. (2005) Ethnographic presence in a nebulous setting, in Hine, C. (Ed.) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford. Berg. pp. 81-92.

Sanders, T. (2005) Researching the online sex community, in Hine, C. (Ed.) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford. Berg. pp. 67-79.

Schmidt, W. C. (2007). Technical considerations when implementing online research. In Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. and Reips, U. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 461-472.

Selwyn, N. and Robson, K. (1998) Using email as a research tool. Social Research Update, Issue 21. Guildford. University of Surrey.

Sharf, B. (1997) Communicating breast cancer online: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health, 26, 1, 65-84.

Smith, M. A. (1998) Voices from the WELL: The Logic of the Virtual Commons,
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/csoc/papers/voices/Voices.htm.

Schneider, S., Kerwin, J., Frechtling, J. and Vivari, B. (2002) Characteristics of the discussion in online and face-to-face focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 1, 31-42.

Stewart, F., Eckermann, E. and Zhou, K. (1998) Using the Internet in qualitative public health research: A comparison of Chinese and Australian young women's perceptions of tobacco. Internet Journal of Health Promotion.

Sweet, C. (2001) Designing and conducting virtual focus groups. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 4, 3, 130 -135.

Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. and Tomic, A. (2004). Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. London. Sage.

Walther, J. B. and D'Addario, K. P. (2001) The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer mediated communication, Social Science Computer Review, 19, 323-345.

Ward, K. J. (1999) The cyber-ethnographic (re)construction of two feminist online communities. Sociological Research Online, 4, 1.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/1/ward.html

Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. (1999) Virtual communities as communities, in Smith, M. A. and Kollock, P.(Eds.) Communities in Cyberspace. London. Routledge. pp. 167-194.

Williams, M., Mason, B. and Renold, E. (2003) Using Computers in Qualitative Research. Building Research Capacity, 8.

Williams, M. and Robson, K. (2004) Re-Engineering Focus Group Methodology for the Online Environment, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 203-222.

 

CLOSE

Alexander, J. (2002a) Homo-pages and queer sites: Studying the construction and representation of queer identities on the world wide web, International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 7, 2-3, 85-106.

Alexander, J. (2002b) Behind the mask: an African gay-affirmative website, International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 7, 2-3, 227-234.

Allen, C. (1996) What's wrong with the golden rule? Conundrums of conducting ethical research in cyberspace, The Information Society, 12, 2, 175-187.

Allen, G. N., Burk, D.L. and Ess, C. (2008) Ethical Approaches to Robotic Data Gathering in Academic Research, International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 1, 1, 9-36.

Anders, E. (2000) Women with Disabilities: Higher Education, Feminism and Social Constructions of Difference, Unpublished PhD thesis. Deaking University, Melbourne, Australia.

Bailey, C. (2001) Geographers doing household research: Intrusive research and moral accountability, Area, 33, 1, 107-109.

Baird, R. M., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S. E. (Eds.) (2000) Cyberethics: Social and Moral Issues in the Computer Age. Amherst NY. Prometheus Books.

Bakardjieva, M. and Feenberg, A. (2001) Involving the virtual subject, Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 4, 233-240.

Barnes, S. B. (2004) Issues of attribution and identification in online social research, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 203-222.

Bassett. E. H. and O'Riordan, K. (2002) Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 233-247.

Berry D. M. (2004) Internet research: Privacy, ethics and alienation: an open source approach, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 14, 4, 323-332.

Bober, M. (2004) Virtual youth research: An exploration of methodological and ethical dilemmas from a British perspective, in Buchanan, E. (Ed.) Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Press. pp. 288-315.

Boehlefeld, S. P. (1996) Doing the right thing: Ethical cyberspace research, The Information Society, 12, 2, 141-152.

Brey, P. (2000) Disclosive computer ethics, Computers and Society, 30, 4, 10-16.

Brownlow, C. and O'Dell, L. (2002) Ethical issues for qualitative research in online communities, Disability & Society, 17, 685-694.

Bruckman, A. (2002a) Ethical Guidelines for Research online
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/ethics/.

Bruckman, A. (2002b) Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disgusing data collected in human subjects research on the Internet, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 217-232.

Bruckman, A. S. (2004) Introduction: Opportunities and challenges in methodology and ethics, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics New York. Peter Lang. pp. 15-24.

Buchanan, E. A. (2000) Ethics, qualitative research and ethnography in virtual space, Journal of Information Ethics, 9, 82-87.

Capurro, R. and Pingel, C. (2002) Ethical issues of online communication research, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 189-194.

Cavanagh, A. (1999) Behaviour in public: Ethics in online ethnography, Cybersociology.

Charlesworth, C. (2008) Understanding and managing legal issues in internet research, in Fielding, N., Lee, R. and Blank, G. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London. Sage. pp. 42-57.

Chen, S. S. , Hall, G. J. and Johns, M. D. (2004) Research paparazzi in cyberspace: The voices of the researched, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp.157-175.

Childress, C. and Asamen, J. (1998) The Emerging Relationship of Psychology and the Internet: Proposed Guidelines for Conducting Internet Intervention Research, Ethics and Behavior, 8, 1, 19-35

Clegg Smith, K. M. (2004) “Electronic eavesdropping”: The ethical issues involved in conducting a virtual ethnography, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) Online Social Research. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 223-238.

Collste, G. (2002) The internet doctor and medical ethics: Ethical implications of the introduction of the internet into medical encounters, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5, 2, 121-125.

Coomber, R. (1997) Using the internet for survey research, Sociological Research Online, 2, 2.
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html.

Cotton, A. H. (2003-2004) Ensnaring webs and nets: Ethical issues in Internet-based research, Contemporary Nurse, 16, 114-123.

Cunneen, C. and Stubbs, J. (2000) Male violence, male fantasy and the commodification of women through the Internet, International Review of Victimology, 7, 5-28.

Curry, M. R. (1991) On the possibility of ethics in geography: Writing, citing and the construction of intellectual property, Progress in Human Geography, 15, 125-147.

Dahlberg, L. (2001) Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7, 1.

DeLorme, D. E., Zinkhan, G. M. and French, W. (2001) Ethics and the internet: issues associated with qualitative research, Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 271-286.

Denscombe, M. (2003) The Good Research Guide for Small Scale Research Projects. Maidenhead. Open University Press.

Denzin, N. (1999) Cybertalk and the method of instances, in Jones, S. (Ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks. Sage. pp. 107-126.

Dyck, I. and Kearns, R. (1995) Transforming the relations of research: Towards culturally safe geographies of health and healing, Health and Place, 1, 137-147.

Economic and Social Research Council (2005) Research Ethics Framework.
http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf.

Elgesem, D. (1996) Privacy, respect for persons and risk, in Ess, C. (Ed.) Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany. University of New York Press. pp. 45-66.

Elgesem, D. (2002) What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 195-203.

Enyon, R., Fry, J. and Schroeder, R. (2008) The ethics of internet research, in Fielding, N., Lee, R. and Blank, G. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London. Sage. pp. 23-41.

Ess, C. (2002a) Introduction, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 177-188.

Ess, C. (2002b) Cultures in collision: philosophical lessons from computer-mediated communication, Metaphilosophy, 33, 1/2, 229-253.

Ess, C. (2004) Epilogue: are we there yet? Emerging ethical guidelines for online research, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 253-263.

Ess, C. (2007) Internet research ethics, in Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T. and Reips, U. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 487-502.

Ess, C. and AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations form the AoIR ethics working committee.
http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.

Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (2001) On the edge: Cultural barriers and catalysts to IT diffusion among remote and marginalized communities, New Media and Society, 3, 3, 259-269.

Ess C. and Sudweeks, F. (2002) Liberation in cyberspace…or computer-mediated colonization?, Electronic Journal of Communication.
http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v12n34.htm.

Eysenbach, G. and Till, J. (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities, British Medical Journal, 323, 7321, 1103-1105.

Foot, K. A., Jankowski, N. W., Kluver, R. and Schneider, S. M. (2003) The internet and elections: An international project for the comparative study of the role of the internet on the electoral process.

Frankel, M. S. (1989) Professional codes: Why, how and with what impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 109-115.

Gatson, S. N. and Zweerink, A. (2004) Ethnography online: 'natives' practicing and inscribing community, Qualitative Research 4, 2, 179-200.

Glaser, J., Dixit, J. and Green, D. (2002) Studying hate crime with the internet: What makes racists advocate racist violence? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 1, 177-193.

Groom, C. and Pennebaker, J. (2005) The language of love: Sex, sexual orientation, and language use in online personal advertisements, Sex Roles, 52, 7-8, 447-461.

Grossman, W. (1997) Net.wars. New York. New York University Press.

Gurak, L. (2001) Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with Awareness. New Haven CT. Yale University Press.

Hacker, K. L. and Steiner, R. (2002) The digital divide for Hispanic Americans, Howard Journal of Communications, 13, 4, 267-84.

Hall, G. J., Frederick, D. and Johns, M. D. (2004) 'NEED HELP ASAP!!!': A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 239-253.

Hamelink, C. J. (2000) The Ethics of Cyberspace. London. Sage.

Heung, V. C. S. (2003) Internet usage by international travelers: Reasons and barriers, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15, 7, 370-378.

Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D. and Vogel, C. (2003) Internet Research Methods. London. Sage.

Hine, C. (2005) Virtual methods and the sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific knowledge, in Hine, C. (Ed.) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford. Berg. pp. 1-13.

Hocks, M. E. (1999) Feminist interventions in electronic environments, Computers and Composition, 16, 107-119.

Hudson, J. and Bruckman, A. (2004) 'Go Away': Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research, The Information Society, 20, 2, 127-139.

Hudson, J. M. and Bruckman, A. (2005) Using Empirical Data to Reason about Internet Research Ethics. Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 18–22 September 2005, Paris.

James, N. and Busher, H. (2007) Ethical issues in online educational research: Protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30, 1, 101-113.

Jankowski, N. W. and van Selm, M. (2005) Epilogue: Methodological concerns and innovations in internet research, in Hine, C. (Ed.) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford. Berg. pp. 199-207.

Janelle, D. G. and Hodge, D. C. (2000) Information, place, cyberspace and accessibility, in Janelle, D. G. and Hodge, D. C. (Eds.) Information, Place and Cyberspace. New York. Springer. pp. 3-12.

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J. and Crowell, T. L. (2004) Surviving the IRB review: Institutional guidelines and research strategies, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 105-124.

Jones, S. (2004) Introduction: ethics and internet studies, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp. 179-185.

Josok, G. H., Lagesen, V. and Sorensen, K. (2003) Out of the boys room? A critical analysis of understanding of gender and ICT in Norway, NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 11, 130-139.

Kearns, R., Le Heron, R. and Romaniuk, A. (1998) Interactive ethics: Developing understanding of the social relations of research, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22, 3, 297-310.

Keller, H. E. and Lee, S. (2003) Ethical issues surrounding human participants research using the Internet, Ethics & Behavior, 13, 211-219.

Kerbs, R. W. (2005) Social and ethical considerations in virtual worlds, The Electronic Library, 23, 5, - 546.

King, S. A. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for reporting of results, The Information Society, 12, 119-127.

Kitchin, H. A. (2003) The tri-council policy statement and research in cyberspace: Research ethics, the internet and revising a 'living document', Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 397-418.

Kleinman, S. S. (2002). Methodological and ethical challenges of researching a computer-mediated group, Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19, 2/3, 49-63.

Langer, R. and Beckman, S. C. (2005) Sensitive research topics: Netography revisited, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8, 2, 189-203.

Losh, S. C. (2004) Gender, educational, and occupational digital gaps 1983-2002, Social Science Computer Review, 22, 2, 152-166.

McRobb, S. and Rogerson, S. (2004) Are they really listening?: An investigation into published online privacy policies at the beginning of the third millennium, Information Technology & People, 17, 4, 442-461.

Ma, R. (1996) Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students, in Herring, S. (Ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam. John Benjamins Publishing. pp. 173-186.

Madge, C. and O'Connor, H. (2002) Online with the e-mums: Exploring the internet as a medium for research, Area, 34, 92-102.

Madge, C. and O'Connor, H. (2005) Mothers in the making? Exploring notations of liminality in hybrid cyber/space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 1, 83-97.

Madge, C. (in progress) Online research methods: Postcolonial promise? To be submitted to Progress in Human Geography.

Madge, C. (2007) Developing a geographers' agenda for online research ethics, Progress in Human Geography, 31, 654-674.

Mann, C. and Stewart, F. (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. London. Sage.

Marks, A. D. and Steinberg, K. K. (2002) The ethics of access to online genetic databases: Private or public? American Journal of PharmacoGenomics, 2, 3, 207-212.

Mathy, R. M., Kerr, D. L. and Haydin, B. M. (2003). Methodological rigor and ethical considerations in Internet-mediated research, Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40, 77-85.

Matthews, H., Limb, M. and Taylor, M. (1998) The geography of children: Some ethical and methodological considerations for project and dissertation work, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22, 3, 311-324.

Michelfelder, D. P. (2000) Our moral condition in cyberspace, Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 3, 147-152.

Mills, B. F. and Whitacre, B. E. (2003) Understanding the non-metropolitan-metropolitan digital divide, Growth and change, 34, 2, 219-243.

Mitchell, B. and Draper, D. (1982) Relevance and Ethics in Geography. London. Longman.

Murray, A. D. (2003) Regulation and rights in networked space, Journal of Law and Society, 3, 2, 187-216.

Nakamura, L. (2002) Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity and Identity on the Internet. New York. Routledge.

Nancarrow, C., Pallister, J. and Brace, I. (2001) A new research medium, new research populations and seven deadly sins for internet researchers, Qualitative market Research: an International Journal, 4, 3, 136-149.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R. and Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet, Journal of Social Issues, 58, 161-176.

O'Dochartaigh, N. (2002) The Internet Research Handbook. A Practical Guide for Students and Researchers in the Social Sciences. London. Sage.

O'Sullivan, P. B. and Flanigan, A. (2003) Reconceptualizing 'flaming' and other problematic communication, New Media and Society, 5, 1, 67-93.

Ono, H. and Zavodny, M. (2003) Gender and the internet, Social Science Quarterly, 84, 1, 111-121.

Paccagnella, L. (1997) Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 1.

Pittenger, D. J. (2003). Internet research: An opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research, Ethics & Behavior, 13, 45-60.

Pitts, V. (2004) Illness and internet empowerment: Writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace, Health, 8, 33-59.

Reid, E. (1996) Informed consent in the study of online communities: A reflection on the effects of computer-mediated social research, The Information Society, 12, 2, 169-174.

Reidenberg, J. R. (2000) Resolving conflicting international data privacy rules in cyberspace, Stanford Law Review, 52, 1315-1376.

Robson, K. and Robson, M. (2002) Your place or mine? Ethics, the researcher and the Internet, in Dilemmas in Welland, T. and Pugsley, L. (Eds.) Qualitative Research. Aldershot. Ashgate.

Rodriguez, J. (2000) A comparative study of internet content regulations in the United States and Singapore: The invincibility of cyber porn, Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, 1, 1.

Roth, R. A. (1989) Preparing the Reflective Practitioner: Transforming the Apprentice through the Dialectic, Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 31-35.

Santos, I. and LeBaron, J. (2006) Ethical constraints in the valid interpretation of transcribed communication in online study, Internet and Higher Education, 9, 3, 191-199.

Scheuermann, L. and Taylor, G. (1997) Netiquette. Internet research. Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7, 4, 269-273.

Schroeder, R. (2007) An overview of ethical and social issues in shared virtual environments. Futures: The journal of planning, forecasting and policy, 39, 6, 704-717.

Schrum, L. (1995) Framing the debate: Ethical research in the information age, Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 311-326.

Schrum, L. (1997) Ethical research in the information age: Beginning the dialog, Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 2, 117-125.

Siegal, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S.and McGuire, T. (1986) Group processes in computer-mediated communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.

Shade, L. R. (2003) Whose global knowledge? Women navigating the net, Development, 46, 49-54.

Sharf, B. (1999) Beyond netiquette. The ethics of doing naturalistic research on the internet, in Jones, S. (Ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks. Sage. pp. 243-256.

Siang, S. (1999) Researching ethically with human subjects in cyberspace, Professional Ethics Report, 12, 4, 7-8.

Silver, D. (2000) Looking backwards, looking forwards: Cyberculture studies 1990-2000, in Gauntlett, D. (Ed.) Webstudies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London. Arnold. pp. 19-30.

Smith, C. (1997) Casting the net: Surveying an Internet population, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 1.

Snyder, D. I. (2002) 'I don't go by Sean Patrick': Online/offline/out identity and SeanPatrickLive.com, International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 7, 2-3, 177-195.

Spinello, R. (2001) Code and moral values in cyberspace, Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 137-150.

Spinello, R. (2003) Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. London. Jones and Bartlett.

Spinello, R. (2004) Readings in Cyberethics. London. Jones and Bartlett.

Stern, S. R. (2003) Encountering distressing information in online research: A consideration of legal and ethical responsibilities, New Media & Society, 5, 249-266.

Stern, S. R. (2004) Studying adolescents online: A consideration of ethical issues, in Buchanan, E. (Ed.) Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies. Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Press. pp. 274-287.

Szabo, A. and Frenkl, M. D. (1996) Consideration of research on the internet: Guidelines and implications for human movement studies, Clinical Kinesiology, 50, 3, 58-65.

Tavani, H. T. and Grodzinsky, F. S. (2002) Cyberstalking, personal privacy and moral responsibility, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 2, 123-132.

Thomas, D. (1988) Legal considerations in internet use- issues to be addressed, Internet Research, 8, 1, 70-74.

Thomas, J. (1996) Introduction: a debate about the ethics of fair practice for collecting social science date in cyberspace, The Information Society, 12, 2, 107-117.

Thomas, J. (2004) Reexamining the ethics of internet research: Facing the challenge of overzealous oversight, in Johns, M. D., Chen, S. S. and Hall, G. J. (Eds.) (2004) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York. Peter Lang. pp.187-201.

Thompsen, P. A. and Foulger, D. A. (1996) Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail, Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 2, 225-243.

Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. and Tomic, A. (2004) Computer Mediated Communication. Social Interaction and the Internet. London. Sage.

Travers, A. (2003) Parallel subaltern feminist counterpublics in cyberspace, Sociological Perspectives, 46, 223-237.

Turkle, S. (1984) The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York. Simon and Schuster.

United National Development Programme (2001) Making New Technologies Work for Human Development.
http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2001/.

Varnhagen, C. K., Gushta, M., Daniels, J., Peters, T. C., Parmar, N., Law, D., Hirsch, R., Sadler Takach, B. and Johnson, T. (2005) How Informed Is Online Informed Consent? Ethics & Behavior, 15, 1, 37-48.

Vujakovic, P. and Bullard, J. (2001) The ethics minefield: issues of responsibility in learning and research, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25, 2, 275-283.

Walther, J. B. (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective, Communication Research, 19, 52-90.

Walther, J. B. (2002) Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 205-216.

Warnock, G. J. (1971) The Object of Morality. Totowa, NJ. Barnes and Noble Books.

Waskul, D. and Douglass, M. (1996) Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of online research, The Information Society, 12, 129-139.

Wasserman, I. M. and Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005) Gender and the internet: Causes of variation in access, level and scope of use, Social Science Quarterly, 86, 1, 252-270.

White, M. (2002) Representations or people? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 249-266.

Williams, M. (2006) Avatar Watching: Participant Observation within an Online Graphical Environment, Qualitative Research, 6, 3.

Yang, C-C. (2000) The use of the internet among academic gay communities in Taiwan: An exploratory study, Information, Communication and Society, 3, 2, 153-172.

 

CLOSE

 

CLOSE