Curriculum Vitae
Thomas received his Ph. D. in Social Sciences from the European University Institute, Florence, Italy. He holds an M.A. from Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen He also studied at the University of California at San Diego and the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Areas of Specialization
- Social Movements / Collective Behavior
- New Religious Movements
- Quantitative Methodology
- Textual Analyses
- Historical-Comparative Methodology
- Sociology of Knowledge
Online Papers
- Ph.D. Dissertation on the New Age Movement
- "The Hegemony of Multiculturalism", Politicka misao (Croatian Political Science Review) 38 (5/2002): 48-61.
Conference Papers
Nationalization vs. Europeanization vs. Globalization of Issues that Should Belong to the European Public Sphere
Paper presented at the ESA Conference "New Directions in European Media" Aristotle University Thessaloniki, November 5-7, 2004.
Routinizing Frame Analysis through the Use of CAQDAS
Paper presented at the Biannual RC-33 Meeting, Amsterdam, August 17-20, 2004.
Reframing Frame Analysis
Systematizing the empirical identification of frames using qualitative data analysis software
Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, August 14-17, 2004.
On Frames and Framing: Anti-Semitism as Free Speech
Paper presented to Session PCR13 (Methods, Research, Concepts) at the IAMCR Annual Meeting, Porto Alegre, Brazil, July 25-30, 2004.
Patterns of Movement Recruitment
Why dense networks help recruitment to new social movements, but obstruct recruitment to the New Age movement
presented at the ASA Annual Meeting 1999
ABSTRACT
While most social movements recruit their members
from dense, submerged networks, movements rooted in Middle America -- such
as New Age and other marketed social movements -- recruit individuals who precisely lack an embeddedness in
dense, emotionally gratifying networks. As a consequence of these differential recruitment patterns, Middle
American movements do not contain grassroots groups. Such grassroots groups have significantly contributed
to
the successful production of collective action by new social (and to a lesser extent poor people's)
movements.
Stiftung Volkswagenwerk and Ford Foundation or STATA Corporation and SPSS, Inc.: Who Rules Sociology?
A Supply-Side Driven Critique of the Discipline´s Segmentation
presented at the
ASA
Annual Meeting 1999
ABSTRACT
Genesis and consequences of sociology´s segmented differentiation are
discussed. It is argued that sociology´s current differentiation is not
a result of theoretical considerations, but instead has been largely determined
by social developments. In particular, social movements have increased
their grip on sociological theory, as many activist scholars have a greater
allegiance to their movement than to the academy. The commercialization
of sociological literature has put some additional extra-scientific pressures
on the discipline. As a consequence, sociology has become organizationally
proliferated along lines that have little to do with intra-disciplinary
developments. This dysfunctional segmentation has led to a weakening of
sociology towards other extra-disciplinary influences. Namely, particularly
in so-called «quantitative sociology,» a growing dependency on commercial
enterprises in the fields of data collection and data analysis can be observed.
From Organziation to Identity
presented at the
MSS
Annual Meeting 1998
ABSTRACT
The quality of the relationship between the organization of a social
movement and its collective identity is still largely unexplored. The central hypothesis of this essay
posits
that resource poor movements enjoying little
institutional support are likely to develop universalistic and
traditionally coded collective identities, while movements whose members command considerable
amounts of tangible resources and cultural capital tend to develop
primordially coded identities. The plausibility of this hypothesis is
illustrated
with the cases of the New Age and feminist movements.
Courses
Winter Semester 2002/03 (University of Göttingen)
Theory and Methodology of International Comparative Research
What a Lousy Study! Rubbish! Goodness Criteria in Social Research